Trinetra

Newsletters > Don’t judge every promoter selling shares – ask these questions before reaching a conclusion

Don’t judge every promoter selling shares – ask these questions before reaching a conclusion

May 14 . 15 MIN READ

Overview

India being a country of trust deficit, it has become a policy to micro analyse promoters' every move all in the name of looking out for the little guy, the shareholders.

 

There certainly isn’t any debate on shareholder interest against promoter interest but where do we draw the line?



It is important to step into the shoes of the promoter to understand his afflictions. Let us explain how things could perhaps look on the other side of the fence.



Skin in the Game



A very common doubt amongst the investing community is if the company’s future growth is certain, then why wouldn’t the promoter increase their own stake? But there’s little empirical evidence of any correlation between the two.



We can have ample example where the stock has performed extremely well inspite of promoters having reduced their stakes at regular interval. For example, Aarti Industries and in fact promoters of one of India’s biggest wealth creation stocks, Page Industries, have sold 1-2 percent of their stake in the company almost every year in the past 10 years!



Reading promoter stake sale directly as a 'red flag' is a market cliché!



The High Price of High Compensation



All hell breaks loose when an analyst in the market sees promoter group/directors remuneration hitting the ceiling of 11 percent as permitted by Companies Act (although that even can be increased by passing a resolution).



We should consider the base effects. Imagine a small-cap company with 50 crores of sales (at 2 times multiple a market cap of 100 crore) operating at 5 percent PAT margins leading to a PAT of 2.5 crore.



Do you really expect the promoter to withdraw a salary of 5 percent of PAT i.e. 12.5 lakhs after creating a 100 crore company?



Naïve right?



Although this topic is debatable and we will go deeper into the issue some other time.



The Family Tree



People hate paying taxes and also there is “Lala” nature in terms of controlling the decision making. Hence to reduce tax paid on income they diversify the earnings among family members and include them into the board to control decision making.



The Cash Trap vs Dividend Dilemma



Sometimes business booms due to industry tailwind and the promoter decides to declare good dividends (which benefits even minority shareholders) to cash-in some money from his booming business. The analyst community would rip them apart stating it is a “no-growth” story. Funnily enough, if the promoters decide to do the exact opposite and start accumulating cash on the balance sheet, even then the promoter would be tagged as a `fool’ as it will reduce Return On Invested Capital and Return on Equity numbers!

 

The Related Party Loan Conundrum 

In small companies, this is a regular event by promoters to fund their liquidity positions. What’s the issue if business had surplus cash even after achieving sustainable growth rates and he is paying market level interest on the same? but sadly, the analyst community would still penalise them citing corporate governance issues!

Till the time a promoter is not taking undue advantage

a) by increasing his stake through amalgamations of private promoter owned entities at absurd valuations or

b) by giving himself ridiculously cheap Employee Stock Ownership Plans to increase the stake, or

c) by diverting funds out of the company for private purposes without interest payment and history of such loan write-offs, or

d) by holding obscene amount of private assets on company balance sheet, or

e) by owning private entities in similar lines of business that are actually performing better than the listed ones.

Let other small things go. Else it becomes a perfect case of analysis-paralysis.

Further, there can be multiple reasons for which a promoter might have to dilute his stake - Qualified Institutional Placements, SEBI regulation to bring shareholding to 75 percent, bringing a strategic buyer on the table which may provide key technology/asset, to release his pledged holdings, classification of shares in the non-promoter category due to family issues leading to reduction in promoter holding or transferring it to some Trust due to taxation purpose or, infact, his business in the lumpy in nature where he cannot predict cash flows so it's better to dilute equity than taking debt etc.

 

The main things to note that is forgotten by market participants is

A) look at the track record of the promoter has he ever defaulted on payments

B) how has the business performed during bad phases of business/industry

C) did the promoter reduce his salary in bad phases of business and

D) how much money has he raised by diluting equity and for what purpose.

I will tell you from personal experience a bad promoter will latch on to the first opportunity he gets for raising money from the public without even having a clue where he will use that.

I still remember a statement by Madhusudhan Kela in an interview when the insider trading case of one of the employees of Divi's Laboratories came into limelight - That boss look at the total equity of Divi's today. The promoter of Divi's has raised money from the public only once during IPO which today in front of total equity he has created is a drop in the ocean and he pays tax fully and such guys cannot be frauds.

 

 

Recent Newsletters

Index investing is an excellent bet in the long term
Read more
A short guide to stock idea generation
Read more
Understanding different phases of a business’ life cycle
Read more
Know drivers of value creation to value a business
Read more
Start-up stocks | The reason why investors don’t make money in start-ups
Read more
Does Warren Buffett’s lesson of investing in businesses with moats work in bull markets?
Read more
Don’t judge every promoter selling shares – ask these questions before reaching a conclusion
Read more
VIEW | Tata Teleservices riding investor exuberance; be cautious
Read more
View | The curious case of Suumaya Industries: Why cashflows matter more
Read more
View: Darlings of yesteryears' bull market lose over Rs 60,000 crore market cap in just 4 years
Read more
Disclaimer:

Note: The above material is neither investment research, nor investment advice. Marcellus does not seek payment for or business from this material/email in any shape or form. Marcellus Investment Managers Private Limited (“Marcellus”) is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) as a provider of Portfolio Management Services. Marcellus is also a US Securities & Exchange Commission (“US SEC”) registered Investment Advisor. No content of this publication including the performance related information is verified by SEBI or US SEC. If any recipient or reader of this material is based outside India and USA, please note that Marcellus may not be regulated in such jurisdiction and this material is not a solicitation to use Marcellus’s services. All recipients of this material must before dealing and or transacting in any of the products and services referred to in this material must make their own investigation, seek appropriate professional advice. This communication is confidential and privileged and is directed to and for the use of the addressee only. The recipient, if not the addressee, should not use this material if erroneously received, and access and use of this material in any manner by anyone other than the addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and immediately destroy all copies of this message and any attachments and delete it from your computer system, permanently. No liability whatsoever is assumed by Marcellus as a result of the recipient or any other person relying upon the opinion unless otherwise agreed in writing. The recipient acknowledges that Marcellus may be unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of the text of the material/email message and the text is not warranted as to its completeness and accuracy. The material, names and branding of the investment style do not provide any impression or a claim that these products/strategies achieve the respective objectives. Further, past performance is not indicative of future results. Marcellus and/or its associates, the authors of this material (including their relatives) may have financial interest by way of investments in the companies covered in this material. Marcellus does not receive compensation from the companies for their coverage in this material. Marcellus does not provide any market making service to any company covered in this material. In the past 12 months, Marcellus and its associates have never i) managed or co-managed any public offering of securities; ii) have not offered investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services; or iii) have received any compensation or other benefits from the company or third party in connection with this coverage. Authors of this material have never served the companies in a capacity of a director, officer, or an employee. This material may contain confidential or proprietary information and user shall take prior written consent from Marcellus before any reproduction in any form.

Sign up for newsletter